What are you looking for?

Active
Arable

Investigation of Bio-stimulants to increase crop yield, biomass, and availability of phosphate in an arable crop.

Supported by:

Summary

Biostimulants are substances or microorganisms that, when applied to crops, stimulate natural processes to improve plant health.  It is claimed that they enhance or benefit nutrient uptake, nutrient use efficiency, tolerance to abiotic stress, and improve crop quality and yield. Biostimulants are a costly input so it is important to farmers know whether they really make a difference to their crops. This trial is to independently assess any claimed benefits and see if biostimulants are an economically viable tool to help reduce or replace other artificial inputs on the farm. 

Six Farmers are participating in the trial to evaluate the benefits of biostimulants. They are partly motivated by a wish to reduce their chemical inputs including fertiliser.  This project aims to test two popular biostimulants that are claimed to promote strong yield benefits under UK conditions.

The field lab is part of the H3 project - Landscape-Scale Regenerative Farming (WP3) works at the landscape scale, evaluating the benefits of regenerative agriculture in terms of improved soil, wider environmental outcomes and food quality. 

The benefits

It is often claimed that Biostimulants can assist farmers and growers in addressing various challenges, such as high fertiliser costs, abiotic/climate-related stress, limited pesticide availability, and increased food demand.

Some biostimulants claim to provide solutions for agricultural productivity and sustainability by improving: 

  • Nitrogen fixing
  • Potassium solubilising
  • Phosphorus solubilising
  • resistance to stress
  • crop yield

However, while there is now a large body of research on this topic, there is often a paucity of data from empirical trials under UK climate and conditions.

Trial design

Six farmers in the midlands will take part in the field trials.  Each will establish randomised tramline plots with 3 replicates each of:

  • Control (no treatment except water)
  • Treatment 1 – 1 application of maxstim biostimulant in spring (as directed by manufacturer)
  • Treatment 2 – 6 applications of Ecostim (ecocereals ) biostimulant (as directed by manufacturer)

The farmers or their agronomists will be doing the assessments and sampling or sending these to a lab to undertake assessments.

The following measurements will be collected:

  • Total yield
  • Above ground biomass – stronger biomass
  • Below ground biomass – visual of roots
  • Potential P – fixed leaf – Flag leaf. Top third. 
  • Available P in the soil – Olsens. Around 20 samples per site so it is representative.
  • Cost per hectare to apply biostimulant
  • Fuel use
  • Increase in yield per hectare
  • Independent yield data per plot
Latest updates

There are no updates at this time.
Please check back later.

Setting up the plots

Spring 24

Application of bio-stimulants Maxstim and 1st of 6 Ecostim (Ecocereal) applications

Spring 24

Underground biomass assessment

Spring 24

Soil sampling for available P

Summer 24

Leaf tissue analysis for P at flag leaf

Summer 24

Harvest – weigh yield/measure above ground biomass

Autumn 24

Results analysed and final report produced

Autumn 24

Group Coordinator

A portrait of Karen Fisher.
Karen Fisher

Soil Association

Bristol

Karen is a Farming Advisor at the Soil Association, as part of the Farm and Land Use team.
She studied agriculture at Aberystwyth and Harper Adams and a MSc in Food Security at Bangor University. She is a qualifed agronomist and has had a 20 year career advising farm managers on the balance of agricultural production with nature. She currently delivers on a number of projects which promotes improving soil health and biodiversity on farm.

Researchers

A portrait of Dr Simon Jeffery .
Dr Simon Jeffery

Harper Adams University

Shropshire

Downloadable Reports

No downloads available.