What are you looking for?

Concluded
Arable

Flowering habitats for pest control

Supported by:

The research

Seven farmers in the North East of England are exploring how flowering habitats affect the distribution, diversity and abundance of pests’ natural enemies.

The farmers and researchers in this field lab will address key questions on how flowering habitats can benefit their commercial farm businesses by measuring the impact of establishment techniques and species mixtures on the diversity, abundance and behaviour of insect pests and their natural enemies. 

Ultimately, the field lab will help farmers see if flower strips can help them reduce their use of insecticides, and provide robust, on-farm methodologies to support inclusion of these habitats on their farms.

The benefits

  • Effective natural enemy communities often depend on plant‐provided resources (e.g. pollen, nectar and shelter), which have become rare in intensified agricultural landscapes. 
  • Flower strips attract insects that are beneficial for pollination and pest control, and field margins play an important role in enhancing insect predators and parasitoids. 
  • By promoting natural enemies, tailored habitat management can potentially increase, or at least maintain yield, at reduced levels of pesticide inputs. 
  • However more work needs to be done to identify the best practices to achieve these benefits, encouraging wider uptake of flowering strips by farmers.

Trial design

Each trial site will include a flowering margin or in-field flowering strips.  100 m transects will be set out in each flowering habitat. Four assessment points will be used on each transect.

The following measurements will be taken on each site by participating farmers:

  • Plant species composition in the flowering habitat
  • Predatory insects and pests - The predatory insects to be assessed in this trial (ground beetles, rove beetles, soldier beetles, spiders, hoverflies, ladybirds, parasitic wasps and dance flies) are known predators of common farmland pests including wireworms, leatherjackets, wheat bulb fly, orange wheat blossom midge, gout fly and frit fly
  • Pitfall trapping for ground dwelling species within the crop and within flowering habitats
  • Yellow sticky traps for aphids, natural enemies and BYDV presence within the crop
  •  Visual assessments of above ground arthropods
  • Moth buckets as an indicator of a healthy ecosystem
Latest updates

The field lab will measure the impact of establishment techniques and species mixtures on the diversity and abundance of natural enemies supported by flowering habitats on commercial farms. Ultimately, the field lab will help farmers see if flower strips can help them to reduce their use of insecticides.

This trial design and associated data collection will provide information on both the spatial and temporal diversity and abundance of flowering species and their associated beneficial insects. The field lab will also produce quantitative data on pest pressure (aphids) and associated crop observations (e.g. BYDV).

The assessments will serve a dual purpose; to provide a baseline quantitative dataset but also to provide farmers with practical ways of conducting their own on farm monitoring for the future.

100 m transects will be set out in each flowering habitat. Where the flowering habitats are field margins, or strips within the crop, additional transects will be completed 10 m into the field and 100 m into the field (the distance between the transects will be determined at the time of sampling depending on field size and the location of the flowering habitats). Four assessment points will be used on each transect.

The following measurements will be taken on each site by participating farmers:
- Plant species composition in the flowering habitat
- Predatory insects and pests - The predatory insects to be assessed in this trial (ground beetles, rove beetles, soldier beetles, spiders, hoverflies, ladybirds, parasitic wasps and dance flies) are known predators of common farmland pests including wireworms, leatherjackets, wheat bulb fly, orange wheat blossom midge, gout fly and frit fly
- Pitfall trapping for ground dwelling species within the crop and within flowering habitats
- Yellow sticky traps for aphids, natural enemies and BYDV presence within the crop
- Visual assessments of above ground arthropods
- Moth buckets as an indicator of a healthy ecosystem

The group met in February to discuss the trial protocols. Key questions regarding the impact flowering margins/strips have on pest control include:
• Is there a difference between conventional and organic sites?
• Can we quantify the impact of flowering mixes on pest control (and can this be linked to reduced insecticide use across varying soil types)?
• Is there an impact of establishment technique?
• Do regenerative practices increase the distance beneficials travel into the crop?

The farmers main pest pressures are Cabbage stem flea beetle, Bruchid beetle, Bird cherry oat aphid, slugs and crows. Main weed concerns are brome, blackgrass, foxtail fescue, bindweed, poppies, mayweed and fat hen.

TRIAL PROTOCOL CONSIDERATIONS:

Treatments:

  • All fields (control and treatment) on all sites have hedgerows – group to provide hedgerow establishment & other metadata
  • All sites will include flowering margin, some willing to include in-field flowering strips
  • Most farmers in the group are not using pesticides

Assessments:

  • Suggested monitoring at distances into the crop to see migration – 50m–250m into crop.
  • Water traps/sticky traps etc. will need guidance on set up
  • Farmers to assess/record observations of pest damage into the crop
  • Group not interested in assessing weed migration into the field

Flowering mixes:

  • Information on current mixes can be found in the farmer profiles, below
  • William has had an unsuccessful first attempt at establishing flowering mix – isn’t sure what will grow on soil type
  • Some growers constrained by environmental schemes although most open to suggestion of mix (potentially tailoring species to target beneficials)

COMMUNICATION:
Group members will communicate via a WhatsApp group throughout the trial. AHDB will provide a record sheet for each assessment timing and send reminder email for assessments and sending traps. There will also be an online meeting when the protocol has been finalised to train those doing assessments.

Assessments of beneficial insects continues

1st July 2021

Set up pitfall traps post harvest

1st October 2021

Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus assessments begin

November 2021

End of barley yellow dwarf virus assessments

April 2022

Assessments of beneficial insects in flowering strips & main crop

Mid may 2022

Weekly aphid assessments

June 2022

Assessments of plant species composition in flowering habitats

July 2022

Group Coordinator

A portrait of Matthew Brearley.
Matthew Brearley

AHDB Cereals & Oilseeds

Having gained a bachelor’s degree in genetics in 2017 and more recently a masters in bioscience abroad in Saudi Arabia, Matthew’s studies have focused around plant genetics and microbiology and after several laboratory positions he joined AHDB as a Knowledge Transfer Officer for Cereal and Oilseeds in November 2021.

Farmers

A silhouette of an unidentifiable person.
Phil Wadsworth

North Yorkshire

A silhouette of an unidentifiable person.
James Standen

Newcastle University Farms

Near Newcastle

A portrait of Frances Standen.
Frances Standen

Birkdale Farm

North Yorkshire

A silhouette of an unidentifiable person.
William Ward

near Northallerton in North Yorkshire

A portrait of Angus Gowthorpe.
Angus Gowthorpe

Approach Farm

south of York

A silhouette of an unidentifiable person.
Denys Fell

East Coast near Hornsea

Researchers

A portrait of Dr. David George .
Dr. David George

Newcastle University

Newcastle

The full results from the flowering margins field lab can be found below. In summary:

  • Across the field lab trials, there was a correlation between the presence of a flowering margin and lower aphids in the adjacent cereal crop. Similarly, there was greater abundance in aphids in the fields associated with a non-flower rich margin.
  • Parasitoid wasps were most numerous in fields without a flower margin, probably because they were to the higher aphid numbers in these fields.
  • It is difficult to confirm causality with the data collected here, so further research is required.